What type of context may be unhelpful in stating the issue in a court case?

Procedural context may be unhelpful in stating the issue in a court case because it primarily pertains to the steps and rules governing how a case is handled within the court system. This includes elements such as filing deadlines, motions, and court protocols. While procedural context is essential for understanding how a case proceeds legally, it does not directly address the substantive issues at the heart of the dispute, such as the facts of the case or the laws being applied.

Substantive context, on the other hand, provides critical information regarding the actual legal issues and principles that are in dispute, which is essential for stating the main issue accurately. Formal context typically relates to the structure and language used in legal documents, contributing to clarity but not obscuring the central factual or legal issues. Therefore, the procedural context stands apart as less relevant when trying to clarify the substantive matter being litigated, which is often what courts are focused on resolving.